I realize that this will not
sound very nice to those of you, like myself, who were born and raised in a
modern post-World War era; but peace is really not all it is cracked up to be.
I say this because people who are not direct parties to a conflict like to use
the word as a positive good, when in fact, it often has a negative outcome.
The classic definition of peace is an absence of hostilities by the parties to a conflict and a mutually-agreed upon cessation of hostilities does not seem to apply here. This technicality is the stumbling block between peaceful co-existence between us and the Palestinians. On paper, they appear to want peaceful relations with us; but in reality, they spend almost all their time and energies on supporting BDS movements and incitement in the press and in their schools and they have been doing this since Oslo. If someone dedicates a town square to someone who has died while committing a suicide bombing, this is not a peace we can live with, nor should the international community be insisting upon it and expecting us to accept this condition. There is no such thing as an expression of peaceful intention by use of high explosives. There is also no such thing as a “freedom fighter” when one already has the freedom to do as they please as long as it is done in a peaceful manner. When someone tries to rob an innocent individual of their right to life, they are merely your garden-variety terrorist.
The classic definition of peace is an absence of hostilities by the parties to a conflict and a mutually-agreed upon cessation of hostilities does not seem to apply here. This technicality is the stumbling block between peaceful co-existence between us and the Palestinians. On paper, they appear to want peaceful relations with us; but in reality, they spend almost all their time and energies on supporting BDS movements and incitement in the press and in their schools and they have been doing this since Oslo. If someone dedicates a town square to someone who has died while committing a suicide bombing, this is not a peace we can live with, nor should the international community be insisting upon it and expecting us to accept this condition. There is no such thing as an expression of peaceful intention by use of high explosives. There is also no such thing as a “freedom fighter” when one already has the freedom to do as they please as long as it is done in a peaceful manner. When someone tries to rob an innocent individual of their right to life, they are merely your garden-variety terrorist.
Surely, it is nice to have
quiet contiguous borders with one’s neighbors, but when does the quiet achieved
become a zero-sum gain? The answer is: when your neighbors with whom you have
reached a peace agreement still want you dead and out of the way. Peace at any
price is an absurdity, both from a historical point of view as well as a
practical approach to life. By its very nature, a lasting and stabilizing peace
cannot be achieved between two parties who have vastly different approaches to
life. Certainly, you can sit down with your enemies and discuss and then reach
a kind of accord after considering borders, commerce and the like, and later
make all kinds of pronouncements to your own political parties and your
peoples. But this is not actual peace, either. And any politician who waves the
banner of promised peaceful co-existence between two or more diametrically
opposed peoples is being highly disingenuous, if not downright delusional and
dishonest. Why do I believe this? Because no one really needs peace in order to
exist as a nation and here is my proof:
The State of Israel has been
in existence since 1948, give or take a few thousand years. In all that time, Israel has been set upon by a multitude of enemies from
Assyrians to Greeks to Romans to Persians to every Arab nation on earth. All
who have sworn to destroy the Jews and Judea
and the modern State of Israel and have embarked upon their campaigns to make a
reality of their words have so far been wildly unsuccessful. We have not only
survived, we have thrived, and all that has been achieved was carried out while
in a virtual state of war with all our neighbors. Evidently, there is something
in our DNA that makes this reality occur throughout our history. If only our
enemies realized this, they would be beating down our doors to sign peace
agreements with us and then stick to them and we would cease to exist as a
nation. As for those with whom we have an “uneasy peace?” When they stop
fighting amongst themselves, they will once again turn their attention to our
destruction. Using history as our guide, it is inevitable.
Here is another thing to mull
over while our politicians attempt to garner favor with the electorate by
throwing the word “peace” around willy-nilly. It is an election cycle and
people say things that make nice sound bites but have no real chance of ever
happening. They recognize that people are tired of war and hatred; but unless
and until the inflammatory comments and inciteful rhetoric of hatred ceases
from both sides to the conflict, there will be no peace. Perhaps it is time we
stop looking for something which will never occur and focus on the reality. We
simply do not need the Palestinians in our lives. We never have needed them,
although they like to insist that we do. Likewise, we do not need anything from
them. We do not need their resources and we do not need them in order to
survive. That is another myth thrown around by them to ensure they keep getting
the trillions of dollars they have already received and wasted from the EU, United States , Russia and the Arab world. It would be nice if someone
turned off their money spigot and made them work for themselves and for their
own state. And here, I am not talking about a physical “disengagement” from the
Palestinians; but rather, a complete and total severance of all interactions,
both security and commercial relationships. We have access to two seas and
airspace to the world. Let the Palestinians find their own borders and make
their own agreements with other nations. They will find the Egyptians amenable
to their requests for border access as soon as they stop importing terror under
their borders and killing Egyptian soldiers and policemen.
We have already done the
heavy lifting and have achieved much and will achieve more in the future. It
should be obvious by now that the Palestinians are not interested in peace with
us. Let the rest of the world figure that out for themselves. Let countries
that claim we “occupy” the Palestinians give them land and resources and money˗˗lots
and lots of money. Let Sweden , Denmark and Norway call us names. Who cares what they think, anyway?
Rarely has anyone bombed their cafes, schools, bars and shopping malls, much
less aimed missiles at them on a regular basis. These are countries that opened
their borders to Nazis without stopping their military juggernaut. Perhaps when
the Palestinians start flooding their countries with their own brand of jihadi
ideology, suicide bombings and weaponry from Syria , Iran , China , North Korea and Russia , we can just sit back and watch. It is time for us to
admit to ourselves that the Palestinians are big on racist incitement against
us, but not really into that whole “love thy neighbor” and “we want peace”
thing.
No comments:
Post a Comment