Monday, June 22, 2015
Is that British spirit, to praise your war-crimes and British atrocities?
Is that British spirit, to praise your
war-crimes and British atrocities?
You clearly told a lie - "they started it".
The children in Dresden, lacerated alive with NAPALM by your evil Grandfathers, "started it"? So what did they start? The war? That's news to me.
Britain started two world wars with Germany - not the other way round, no matter how much you British people lie about it. Also it was Britain who started bombing German cities in 1939 - the Germans retaliated in 1940. If you dont want war, do not start bombing innocent women and children, you British people.
It has been British tradition since the Middle Ages, to not tolerate successful Nations next to her and always to destroy the biggest power on the continent - regardless of who it is. Britain wanted to rule the world all by herself. First it was the Spanish (remember the "Armada"?), the it was France, and since 1871 Germany happened to be unlucky enough, to commit the "crime" and producing better goods, more goods, and more quality goods than your little Island did.
The British Empire tried to destroy not the Nazis, but the German people , due to Jealousy. That is why she made up the rumours of "Germans spearing children" since 1914, or "Germans wanting to dominate the world". Look at the map, and you will see who actually ruthlessly tried to dominate the world.
No matter how much you British people keep lying about your crimes and atrocities - it is a fact that "helping Poland" was a lie, and England's pretext to destroy her biggest competitor, who had surpassed her in manufacturing already during Queen Victoria's rule. (a German Queen, by the way).
You British people waged war under a pack of lies, so if you wanted to "help Poland", why do you hide the fact in your schools, on your TV, in your newspapers, that Poland had occupied German territory? And not vice versa? If anyone needed "Help" it was the 2.0 Million Germans and 6 Million Ukrainians living under Polish tyranny, a situation created by the wicked British in their Versailles crime 1919.
The only reason why Britain waged this war, was to destroy the German people, to stop the Germans from peacefully trading, and to kill as many German women and children as possible. All this British Hollywood-Propaganda "we saved the Jews", we brought democracy" etc ist just the same Anglo-american lies like in the Iraq war, in the Vietnam war and all other crimes committed by the "good" Allies. Hitler played no role, Britain would have destroyed Germany under anybody's rule. And in spite of British Hollywood-style propaganda, "saving the Jews" was the last thing the British child-killers ever intended.
"We do not merely fight the Nazis - we fight the whole German nation".
(Quote Lord Robert Vansittart, notorious British German-hater and Chief Advisor in the British Foreign Ministry to Lord Halifax 1942)
PS:
Funnily enough, the evil hate-speech publications of warmonger Lord Robert Vansittart are nowhere to be found in Britain - not a single British school book contains them. I am not surprised at all.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I am a Disabled War Veteran, a Naval Officer who flew 118 combat missions. I am have studied war "a lot", that was my career including hours on end studying at the war college. I am afraid that you have a single-sided view of the events that led to WWI and WWII, it is not as simple as you are making it.
ReplyDeleteTo focus on WWII, the invasion of Poland 1 Sept '39 did not happen in a vacuum. Deals were made with Stalin for the partition of Poland and Hitler was convinced that the free world (i.e France & England) would not intervene just like the taking over of Austria and Czechoslovakia... I am not even mentioning the fate of what Nazis considered "lesser humans" such as the German Jews, Roman, Gays, sick... I worked with Germans, British (NATO). I was liaison officer with the French Navy as well. I met many people who fought in WWII from all sides.
Think about the V-Weapons (i.e. Vengeance), no strategic value, just blindly sent as retaliation.
Read or talk to Russians about the agony and the atrocities of the Eastern Front. Ask Germans about not getting war supplies because the ammo train got diverted to carry Jews to the slaughterhouse while Hitlers' entourage was well protected against bombers.
Before Cologne, Hamburg, etc there was Rotterdam who was probably the first firestorm.
After the fall of France, before the involvement of the US, England stood alone (with reinforcement mostly from Canada) against the Nazis. If you can express your opinion freely on this website, you can thank them. You would not have that option in a totalitarian state - talk to older Germans.
Finally, Germany turned against its former ally (USSR), think about all their soldiers that made the ultimate sacrifice in unbelievable conditions because Hitler did not accept retreat! Disengaging in combat is part of warfare science, possibly more than a corporal dictator knows about total war.
I do not agree with city bombing but the war had to stop - there is no second place trophy for the loser. Goering bombed London for six months, blindly - he just did not have the means that the RAF and USAF would develop later. Ask the average German of that era how he enjoyed the fact that anyone could turn you in to the Gestapo.
Read how Hitler redirected his bombers to London, the story is well known. Hitler broke all the promises (about peace) he made with French and British authorities. By the time he invaded Poland, the Allies knew that they were next and that appeasement would not work hence the ultimatum that war would start on the 3rd of Sept (after Germany was way into Poland already).
Nazis committed their share of atrocities - a lot against their own people.
Please pay respect to all the people (military and civilian) who died regardless of race, nationality or creed and thank your higher power that you did not have to suffer their agony.
I am an American by the way.
Lancelot (my call sign from my flying days)
Dear Lancelot,
ReplyDeleteIt's funny to hear an AMERICAN of all people using the word "one-sided".
The Germans have admited all their crimes long time ago. In Berlin there are Holocaust-museums, Holocaust memorials, the Germans have payed billions to the Jews and apologized 1000 times.
So now an American comes up to me, whose country has never apologized for their Bombing-holocaust on the defenseless city of Dresden, and talks to me about "one-sided"?
Wow, you Americans really are hypocrites, arent you? You do not seem to know any official history, do you? History was writetn by YOUR country, it is a history of fraud and cover-up. And as soon as somebody dares to mention facts like Allied warcrimes, you talk about "one-sided"?
Boy, you really are an honourless nation, I am glad i am NOT American or British. You should be deeply ashamed of yourself. Neither the victims of the Dresden-Terrorbombing, nor the victims of Hiroshima have ever received an apology from you "innocent" American and British people. But only the Germans are "collectively guilty", right?
The Germans have never attacked America, never killed children or women there or bombed cities. But you Americans thought you have the right to brutally slaughter 600 000 children and women, deliberately, in Germany?
And, no, it was not "necessary". Neither Dresden nor Hiroshima. The aim was to satisfy pervers American-British bloodlust.
The Germans have all admitted their warcrimes long time ago, so what the hell do you want from me? But YOU honourless American-British people not only failed to apologize for your massmurder on innocents, you even do no officially admit you commited warcrimes.
Even though the whole world knows it!
Be ashamed to stem from a nation who lies about their warcrimes.
regards
Tamino
PS:
And remember, your British-American forefathers exterminaated the Red Indians - biggest holocaust in history. No memorial, no reparations, no apology. And YOU dare talk to me about "one-sided"?
Jack Proud American says:
ReplyDelete19 Mar 2010 01:16:45 PM
I have no idea who the hell is teaching you people the history of WW1 and WW2. 6 million people were slaughtered by the Nazi's for no reason other than their race. that should be all that needs to be said. that doesn't even hold a freaking candle to 600,000 (if that is even a real estimate of the fatalities in Dresden) and the treaty of Versailles was a crime? HA Germany was fortunate they were allowed to exist! throughout history conquering nations didn't simply take away the defeated nations army and a bit of land. they slaughtered its people and plundered it riches. Germany should have gratefully accepted the treaty and been glad to continue as a self ruling nation. you think if Hitler or Japan would have taken America they would have given it back with nothing but a slap on the wrist? WE (Americans) didn't start the war! WE were forced into Both wars. most Americans were pro isolationist until we were attacked. ww1 German U-boats openly attacked American merchant ships killing hundreds of people. our nations security was at risk and ww2 we were attacked on Dec7 PEARL HARBOR we lost more men on that day than all of WW1. I am also of Native American Descent or your "red Indian" and that was a terrible time in the history of America but most of those people were not (starved, shot or burned) Most died off due to disease because they had no immunities to the viruses brought to America. you need to look at Real History sometime. How do you think that British started WW2? oh by looking the other way when Germany took Austria? or Czechoslovakia? or maybe when they started building up a massive arsenal of war supplies? oh ye it must have been when they did nothing to stop Germany from remilitarized the Rhineland. Ye the British definitely started that war because they were jealous... (in fact the allies bent over backwards in a campaign of appeasing Hitler to avoid war.) that's all I'm going to say here.
There is no denying that the bombings of German cities such as Dresden were wrong. But anyone who would argue that Germany should not take responsibility for WW1 and WW2 is simply living in denial. anyone who would call the Allied powers mass murderers or blood lusty is simply ignorant to the facts of those wars. Germany was always the aggressor nation. Tamino your the one who needs to check up on your history. Germans did in fact attack American ships (Civilian Ships) and Germany also supported Japan in its Sneak attack on Pearl Harbor. Germany declared war on America as soon as Japan did.
ReplyDeleteShould you bother to consult your history books you will find that the war started with the battle for Poland and proceeded on to the battle for France by way of Belgium and neutral Holland. Throughout both these campaigns the strategy of blitzkrieg was used. This involved the close co-operation of the German air force and army and consisted of rapid movement on the ground by way of tanks supported by motorized infantry with air cover softening up or destroying dug in opposition c.f. schwerpunkt. (This is what the Stuka was designed for.) The roads were cleared of irritating refugees by strafing them. Occupants of towns were demoralized or permanently removed by bombing the towns and cities. (You might be aware of what happened to Guernica in the practice run for WW2 or what happened to Warsaw, Rotterdam, etc.etc.etc.) As Hitler said on August 22 1939 (that is prior to the start of the war) "I have mobilized my Skull Squads with the command to unpityingly and mercilessly send men, women and children to their death. Who is still talking today about the extinction of the Armenians?".
ReplyDeleteHaving conquered mainland Europe and, unable to get his army to walk on water, he used his air force to bomb the British towns in the German tourist Baedeker guidebook. (These were not military targets but tourist towns, the object being again to demoralize.)
Imagine the shock when Britain had the cheek to retaliate, although in the case of Dresden it was bombed because it was an SS H.Q. (c.f Gunter Grasse ). The German air raids used equal numbers of aircraft but the reason why more damage was inflicted by the RAF was that our aircraft were bigger and were designed to operate independently of the army.
Frank,
ReplyDeleteTry finding a copy of a book called "Bomber Boys. The Ruhr, the Dambusters and bloody Berlin" by Kevin Wilson, published by Cassell Military Classics (www.orionbooks.com.uk). I am reading this at the minute and it is full of very detailed information about all of the Allied bombing raids carried out during 1943.
In regards to the raid of 2 August 1943, it states
"Planners of the last of the Hamburg raids had intended that the first four waves would use the northerly point of the Alster lake as their aiming point, which should concentrate bombing in the wealthy Harvest-hude and Rotherbaum areas and the city centre. The aiming point for the final two waves would be the middle of Hamburg 8 miles to the south. As it was, the weather conditions resulted in bombs being scattered all over Hamburg and the countryside around."
10 Jul 2012 11:31:07 AM
ReplyDeleteI think a lot of people here should read "History of bombardments" by Sven Lindquist (Swedish and really impartial).
I every war, every side make atrocities and that's something we couldn't forget. Ok, Germans killed millions of people and they were punished for that after the 2 world wars. But hey! British, American or French are NO ANGELS (please, look for the British raids against their colonies. Spanish and French were the first ones using biological weapons in Morocco (War of Riff)).And don't make me write about the USA (you've got lots of good things, believe me when I say that because I really think so, but guys, in some wars you should have been send into The Hague Court because of war crimes...)
I think we all should be very careful talking about war because it's a very serious topic. Not every German was a Nazi (the White Rose or Die weiße Rose resistance group) and British also have their own war criminal (Arthur Harris) who was not condemned for their murders (he bombed thousands of civilians in British colonies before WWII).
So please, this is very serious. I've read some really disgusting and worrying comments here from both sides.
The ones who really suffered wars are the civilians murdered by "strategic bombings".
And one more thing, for those of you who don't bother the people killed in Dresden: do you REALLY think that children were guilty of WWII (or Hitler's mental insanity) to be deserved for being bombed or burned with Napalm???? In that case, I do think that you must go to a shrink, dudes...
P.S.: I'm Norwegian and I don't have patriotically feelings with any sides. The only thing I believe is what Hobbes said: "The Man is a wolf for the man"
29 Jul 2012 12:41:35 PM
ReplyDeleteMost nations have comitted grievous acts of mass murder and barbarism against other nations and/or their own people. The level of brutality was raised many fold by the German and Japanese war machines - hideous mass-murdring and mass-raping monstrosities. American atrocities in Vietnam and the unnecessary and immoral Iraq War demonstrate how easily a nation can slip from justifiable defense to mass murder. The lack of morality and courage to stand up to authority, combined with the outright stupidity and selfishness, of most human beings would seem to be a more probable cause for all of these tragic wars than particular ideologies and social systems. Stupid, mean-spirited, immoral and amoral people of many nations gleefully support mass murder on patriotic and nationalistic grounds, but quickly adopt the role of outraged victims when things don't work out.
17 Jan 2013 05:31:04 PM
ReplyDeleteI am stunned by the number of holocaust deniers and nazi sympathizers posting here. So let us cut to the chase, as we say in America.
Germany, during the Nazi era, was the most vicious and murderous nation in the history of man. Tens of millions were murdered, mostly in Eastern Europe and Russia to make room for German expansion. This includes millions of my Jewish brethren in ways that defy description. They also killed Gypsies etc.There was no limit to the evil that Germany was willing to commit.
The fact that Germany had to be almost completely destroyed is a testament to their insanity and the understanding by the allies that Germany had to be defeated at any cost. And millions of good allied soldiers died in this great cause. We should all thank god they were willing to make the ultimate sacrifice for us. Even the monstrous fools posting drivel on this website.
And if you have any doubt as to the level of German cruelty and evil, I suggest you visit the Yad Vahem website.
30 May 2013 11:20:14 AM
ReplyDeleteI am amazed at the number of comments about "war crimes." So, there are civilized rules for killing as many of the enemy (whichever enemy) as possible? Ludicrous. That is why war is to be avoided. Ancient warfare was no different. Cities were put to the sword and torch. Survivors were enslaved. But we now believe that we're more "civilized" and can kill each other in an orderly manner? One can see the on-going delusion in the passionate comments about events from 70 years ago.
21 Sep 2013 04:57:08 PM
ReplyDeleteSo very British-phial, starting the article with qualifying statement absolving Britain's responsibilities and blaming the Germans. The next paragraph proceeded trying to be seemed by readers as fair. On Polish bombing, the element of pity and little girl suffering was used. In this article, Bomber Harris' actions was seen as a necessary evil Britain had no choice to do.
Comments from pro Allied are expected and very focus minded if not narrow minded. If Nazi German are so evil in bombing, compare the number of deaths caused by Luftwaffe bombing if Britain against the opposite. You will find the stats as disturbing and starting to question Britain's motive.
Britain is guilty of war crimes. They started the war by declaring war against the Germans who wants back its lost territories (bigger part of Prussia until Mammal). British also refuse Hitler's peace initiative many times over after the defeat of France. if it was not because support from its domains like Australia and Canada, British should have lost the war.
8 Nov 2013 11:19:10 AM
ReplyDeleteBut of course - Hitler was no more then just a good but misunderstood uncle wanted all good for all of us and those evil Brits spitefully spread havoc...
Sorry man, but your comment is completely ridiculous...
To compare just death toll caused by Luftwaffe and by RAF is useless. Mentioned air forces worked on very different principles so they were differently equipped and so they had very different results in some types of missions. German Luftwaffe was tactical power designed primarily to support advancing ground troops. Doing this Luftwaffe did great job but when Germans wanted to do some strategic air raids it does not work just because the aircraft could not carry necessary bomb load. On the other hand Bomber Command RAF was strategic air force created to break the enemy - to take away the ability to fight and break the will to fight. Again - doing this results were good enough. But look at the disastrous use of light bombers in tactical role against advancing German troops in France in 1940...
Briefly - if you compare just numbers, you compare incomparable.
30 May 2014 10:27:33 AM
ReplyDeleteGermany started a war that killed 50 million people. They spread terror and death across Europe. They also started the aerial war against Britain. So, Britain was justified in using any means to defeat the Germans. Given how the Germans behaved on the Eastern front, and in occupied countries, and their attempted annihilation of the Jews of Europe, I have no sympathy for them. But, I do think that they have learned that starting wars of aggression can have painful results for the aggressor. It took the Germans close to a half century to absorb that lesson.
It's often said that German production was not affected by bombing. This is untrue. At the end of the war German production of aircraft was essentially unchanged. British production had increased many times.
bravo company. says:
ReplyDelete31 May 2014 08:04:40 PM
4 tours in Iraq. Trillion doll. Later. They are begging us to come back to secure their country. Just like Marshall plan. Nazis, blew up. Their own factories. ,power station . Hydro. ,just so soviets wouldn't get hands on it . U.S.A. Spent trillions in today's money back then to rebuild Germany. .and little thing called Berlin airlift for 3 years. To feed. And heat a whole city by air. Don't ever say we are the aggressor. We are going broke being the world police and grocery store. And school , power station. Rail, dam builders, some one gave us money for aid, U.S.A. would **** themselves!!!! amen!!!
5 Jun 2014 12:07:54 PM
ReplyDeleteTalk about missing the point. The Battle of Waterloo, which involved most of Europe, took place in a single day. The entire First World War was waged for five years while life in Paris, Berlin and London carried on as usual, its residents virtually untouched. It was a traditional war, with only soldiers fighting and that within a restricted area. The Second World War was a war against civilians. The aim was to kill as many people as possible and, if that didn't succeed, to destroy every building, railway, dam, electricity and gas supply line so that those people suffered starvation, disease and homelessness. Counting bombs and arguing about who did what is irrelevant. It was a war to kill 60 million ordinary, innocent people. We should all keep a very close eye on our politicians, military, and armament manufacturers.
Anonymous says:
ReplyDelete11 Nov 2014 12:40:37 AM
Wars are often started with little regard for outcome and course of action. Germany started the war. Dresden had approximately 125 functioning war plants. Goebbels even mentioned this in private conversation. My family was disrupted for 4 years and my uncle a POW of the Japanese. Don't start wars you cannot win. Bad things will happen.
THE BOMBING OF CIVILIANS IN WORLD WAR II
ReplyDelete"The Prime Minister said that we hoped to shatter twenty German cities as we had shattered Cologne, Lubeck, Dusseldorf, and so on. More and more aeroplanes and bigger and bigger bombs. M. Stalin had heard of 2-ton bombs. We had now begun to use 4-ton bombs, and this would be continued throughout the winter. If need be, as the war went on, we hoped to shatter almost every dwelling in almost every German city. " (Official transcript of the meeting at the Kremlin between Winston Churchill and Josef Stalin on Wednesday, August 12, 1942, at 7 P.M.)
"The destruction of German cities, the killing of German workers, and the disruption of civilized community life throughout Germany [is the goal]. ... It should be emphasized that the destruction of houses, public utilities, transport and lives; the creation of a refugee problem on an unprecedented scale; and the breakdown of morale both at home and at the battle fronts by fear of extended and intensified bombing are accepted and intended aims of our bombing policy. They are not by-products of attempts to hit factories." -- "Air Marshal Arthur Harris, Commander in Chief, Bomber Commander, British Royal Air Force, October 25, 1943 quoted in Tami Biddle, Rhetoric and Reality in Air Warfare: The Evolution of British and American Ideas about Strategic Bombing, 1914-1945 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002), p. 220.
Is the deliberate mass murder of civilians on a huge scale ever justified? This article does not have an answer for this question. However, it is important to note that this was a very specific goal of England and America in World War II as the quotes above show. Germany and Japan also bombed civilians but the scale of what they did was a tiny fraction of their opponents. More people died in the bombing of Hamburg alone that in the entire German bombing campaign against England. Was the Anglo-American bombing necessary or moral? Many serious military experts feel it was a poor choice in terms of military priorities. What follows is documentation from both sides.
Jordan is Arab-Palestine
ReplyDeleteIn compliance with the 1920 League of Nations Resolution, two-state solution was illegally implemented in 1922 when British administration of occupied Israel in violation of International Treaties, (for 50 barrels of oil) allocated more than 77% of Israel territory to Arab-Palestinian and created Transjordan (now Jordan on all the territory east of the Jordan River, which was Jewish allocated territory) where today over 90 percent of the population identify themselves as Arab-Palestinian. Every party, including UN, EU, US, etc., must respect The 1920 San Remo Treaty which made the Balfour Declaration an international law, the League of Nations Resolutions, adopted and accepted by UN in 1945. Therefore, all so called “Arab-Palestinians” must be relocated to Jordan. Enough of stealing Israel’s Jewish land. Britain and Jordan must compensate Israel for stolen land and natural resources. That includes the assets and 75,000 sq. mi. of Jewish owned land of the million Jewish families and their children, (that lived in the Arab countries for over 2,500 years), who were terrorized and expelled from Arab countries of which the majority settled in Greater Israel. (120,444 sq. km. of Jewish Real property was confiscated, which is 6 times the size of Israel and valued in the trillions of dollars).
The League of Nation was contemplating on filing charges against Britain for violating the terms of the Mandate for Palestine, especially for restricting Jewish immigration prior and during WW2 1939-1947, which caused the deaths of millions of Jews trying to escape German extermination camps.
History of “Arab-Arab-Palestinians”.
Article 24 of the 1964 PLO Charter addressed to UN stipulates: “Arab-Palestinian Muslims do not exercise authority over West Bank (Judea and Samaria) and Gaza territories”
Arab leaders like Auni Bey Abdul-Hadi told the Peel Commission in 1937: “There is no such country as ‘Palestine’; ‘Palestine’ is a term the Zionists invented!”
In 1946, Arab historian Philip Hitti testified before the Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry that “there is no such thing as Palestine in history.”
In 1977, an executive committee member of the PLO Zahir Muhsein confirmed that there is no such thing as a separate “Arab-Palestinian” people of Arab descent. In an interview with the Dutch newspaper Trouw in March 31, 1977, he stated the following: “The Arab-Palestinian people do not exist. The creation of a second Arab-Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity.”
In 1948, Bernadotte, mediator between Jews and Arabs appointed by the UN General Assembly, noted in his journal that the “Arab-Palestinian” had little desire for independence:
“The Arab-Palestinian had at present no will of their own. Neither have they ever developed any specifically Arab-Palestinian nationalism. The demand for a separate Arab state in Palestine is consequently relatively weak. It would seem as though in existing circumstances most of the Arab-Palestinian would be quite content to be incorporated in Transjordan.”
In 1947, Arab leaders protesting the illegal UN partition plan argued that Palestine was part of Syria and “politically, the Arabs of Palestine (were) not (an) independent separate … political entity.”
Western media must stop broadcasting and publishing fraudulent, deceptive, fake, false, and distorted information on Israel and the Jews. Current situation, specifically in Europe, is quite similar to 1930’s, however, we, Jews, learned our lessons and will not hesitate to give appropriate response to any mortal attacks on us.
YJ Draiman
“We must be ready to sacrifice all for our country Israel. For history does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid. We must continue to acquire proficiency in defense and display determination and stamina in purpose.” Never surrender – we are fighting for our survival and the alternative is extinction.
ReplyDeleteIsrael’s mission first and foremost is to take care of the Jewish people and insure their safety and security in Israel. Israel’s obligation is to its Jewish People and not to pacify the world at large. The historical facts are that for thousands of years the world at large has always persecuted the Jewish people and stood idle while millions of Jews are exterminated and persecuted.
Right now we are in a badly separated, internally struggling, and bickering state both within Israel and also in the Diaspora. And our enemies are happily latching onto this internal fragmentation exploiting us against each other and leading successful campaigns against us on all fronts.
No political wisdom, trickery; neither weapons and a mighty army can save Israel or Jews worldwide unless we rise above our differences, above our argumentative nature and form a single united Nation that is impenetrable.
And that wouldn’t just save us but would blaze a trail of hope for others in this crazy world where there are no allies or friends any more only enemies waiting for the opportunity to destroy each other.
We may not agree on everything, but we must respect each other and work together for our common goal which is survival in this hostile world which is on a spiraling deterioration.
“A United Israel is a Strong Israel” Unity above all is our key to survival.
YJ Draiman
The Arabs occupy a lot of other peoples since the 7th century. The nature of their rule never changes: ethnic and religious cleansing. It’s still going on under your eyes.
ReplyDeleteIn 1925 the Chaldeans (non Arabs, non Muslims) were a majority in Iraq (British census); less than 1% today. Same for the Copts in Egypt, the Tamazight in Morocco, the Kabyles in Algeria. The black peoples of Africa (Sudan, Mauritania, Zanzibar etc) are enslaved by the Arab occupiers. WHAT DO WE DO FOR ALL THESE PEOPLES? The Jews were, by millions, indigenous to the region 2,000 years before the Arab occupation; today the “Arab World” is completely judenrein.
The Arab occupation is NOT the result of any external aggression. It is a murderous invasion they proudly call “the Arab conquest”. The worst predators this planet has ever seen …. And besides, they turned the countries they occupied into a huge cesspool.
“We must be ready to sacrifice all for our country Israel. For history does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid. We must continue to acquire proficiency in defense and display determination and stamina in purpose.” Never surrender – we are fighting for our survival and the alternative is extinction.
ReplyDeleteIsrael’s mission first and foremost is to take care of the Jewish people and insure their safety and security in Israel. Israel’s obligation is to its Jewish People and not to pacify the world at large. The historical facts are that for thousands of years the world at large has always persecuted the Jewish people and stood idle while millions of Jews are exterminated and persecuted.
Right now we are in a badly separated, internally struggling, and bickering state both within Israel and also in the Diaspora. And our enemies are happily latching onto this internal fragmentation exploiting us against each other and leading successful campaigns against us on all fronts.
No political wisdom, trickery; neither weapons and a mighty army can save Israel or Jews worldwide unless we rise above our differences, above our argumentative nature and form a single united Nation that is impenetrable.
And that wouldn’t just save us but would blaze a trail of hope for others in this crazy world where there are no allies or friends any more only enemies waiting for the opportunity to destroy each other.
We may not agree on everything, but we must respect each other and work together for our common goal which is survival in this hostile world which is on a spiraling deterioration.
“A United Israel is a Strong Israel” Unity above all is our key to survival.
YJ Draiman
Jordan is Arab-Palestine
ReplyDeleteIn compliance with the 1920 League of Nations Resolution, two-state solution was illegally implemented in 1922 when British administration of occupied Israel in violation of International Treaties, (for 50 barrels of oil) allocated more than 77% of Israel territory to Arab-Palestinian and created Transjordan (now Jordan on all the territory east of the Jordan River, which was Jewish allocated territory) where today over 90 percent of the population identify themselves as Arab-Palestinian. Every party, including UN, EU, US, etc., must respect The 1920 San Remo Treaty which made the Balfour Declaration an international law, the League of Nations Resolutions, adopted and accepted by UN in 1945. Therefore, all so called “Arab-Palestinians” must be relocated to Jordan. Enough of stealing Israel’s Jewish land. Britain and Jordan must compensate Israel for stolen land and natural resources. That includes the assets and 75,000 sq. mi. of Jewish owned land of the million Jewish families and their children, (that lived in the Arab countries for over 2,500 years), who were terrorized and expelled from Arab countries of which the majority settled in Greater Israel. (120,444 sq. km. of Jewish Real property was confiscated, which is 6 times the size of Israel and valued in the trillions of dollars).
The League of Nation was contemplating on filing charges against Britain for violating the terms of the Mandate for Palestine, especially for restricting Jewish immigration prior and during WW2 1939-1947, which caused the deaths of millions of Jews trying to escape German extermination camps.
History of “Arab-Arab-Palestinians”.
Article 24 of the 1964 PLO Charter addressed to UN stipulates: “Arab-Palestinian Muslims do not exercise authority over West Bank (Judea and Samaria) and Gaza territories”
Arab leaders like Auni Bey Abdul-Hadi told the Peel Commission in 1937: “There is no such country as ‘Palestine’; ‘Palestine’ is a term the Zionists invented!”
In 1946, Arab historian Philip Hitti testified before the Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry that “there is no such thing as Palestine in history.”
In 1977, an executive committee member of the PLO Zahir Muhsein confirmed that there is no such thing as a separate “Arab-Palestinian” people of Arab descent. In an interview with the Dutch newspaper Trouw in March 31, 1977, he stated the following: “The Arab-Palestinian people do not exist. The creation of a second Arab-Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity.”
In 1948, Bernadotte, mediator between Jews and Arabs appointed by the UN General Assembly, noted in his journal that the “Arab-Palestinian” had little desire for independence:
“The Arab-Palestinian had at present no will of their own. Neither have they ever developed any specifically Arab-Palestinian nationalism. The demand for a separate Arab state in Palestine is consequently relatively weak. It would seem as though in existing circumstances most of the Arab-Palestinian would be quite content to be incorporated in Transjordan.”
In 1947, Arab leaders protesting the illegal UN partition plan argued that Palestine was part of Syria and “politically, the Arabs of Palestine (were) not (an) independent separate … political entity.”
Western media must stop broadcasting and publishing fraudulent, deceptive, fake, false, and distorted information on Israel and the Jews. Current situation, specifically in Europe, is quite similar to 1930’s, however, we, Jews, learned our lessons and will not hesitate to give appropriate response to any mortal attacks on us.
YJ Draiman