Origins
of the Jewish Community of New York:
The Brazilian Connection
The Brazilian Connection
I. Introduction
New York City is an eclectic melting pot where
people have come in search of new
opportunities for a better life. It has one of the most important Jewish communities in America.
Surprisingly, most people do not know the origins and history of this Jewish community. The first Jews
to arrive in New York came from Recife, Brazil. Although they were a group of only twenty-three, their
contribution was immeasurable. Wherever they went, they left a mark of their influential presence.
opportunities for a better life. It has one of the most important Jewish communities in America.
Surprisingly, most people do not know the origins and history of this Jewish community. The first Jews
to arrive in New York came from Recife, Brazil. Although they were a group of only twenty-three, their
contribution was immeasurable. Wherever they went, they left a mark of their influential presence.
In Recife, Brazil, they founded Kahal Zur Israel, the first
synagogue of the New World. In 1654,
when they arrived in New York, then known as New Amsterdam, they founded
Shearith Israel, the first Jewish
congregation in North America. These pioneer Jews had to fight for the creation
of Jewish temples of worship, schools, and cemeteries in a time when
there was no freedom of religion. During
this arduous process, they had a tremendous influence in the battle for equal
rights. Today, the achievements of
these Jews represent a victory for people of all faiths.
The story of these twenty-three Jewish
founders also reflects the possibility of accomplishing
successful endeavors regardless of the difficulties encountered along the way. It is truly a miracle that
they were able to escape to New York at a time when there was strong anti-Semitism from the
Portuguese and a war between Portugal and Holland. They faced great financial hardships when they
were expelled from Brazil. After arriving in New Amsterdam, they lived in a state of poverty, hostility,
and prejudice. Even though they were discriminated against by the governor, the sheriff, and the
Reverend of the Dutch Reform Church, the Jewish pilgrims established one of the most dominant
Jewish communities in the world.
successful endeavors regardless of the difficulties encountered along the way. It is truly a miracle that
they were able to escape to New York at a time when there was strong anti-Semitism from the
Portuguese and a war between Portugal and Holland. They faced great financial hardships when they
were expelled from Brazil. After arriving in New Amsterdam, they lived in a state of poverty, hostility,
and prejudice. Even though they were discriminated against by the governor, the sheriff, and the
Reverend of the Dutch Reform Church, the Jewish pilgrims established one of the most dominant
Jewish communities in the world.
Despite an outstanding effort to blend in with
the American society, these Jewish settlers managed to maintain their identity and
culture. They remained connected to their Jewish roots and passed on their
traditions from generation to generation.
These few immigrants laid the foundation for what is today the
Jewish community of New York.
1
II - Brief History of
New York City
The Dutch and the Dutch West India Company
first named New York City New Amsterdam. According to Cityscapes: A History of New York in Images, New
Amsterdam’s colony was founded “in the search
for empire by the Dutch West India Company following the explorations of Henry Hudson”
(Rock and Moore 1). The settlement’s focus was trade, and the most important
one was fur followed by tobacco. The authors also note that the first
permanent settlement on Manhattan was established
in 1626, when Director Peter Minuit purchased the island from the Indians (1).
Interestingly, Rock and Moore mention
that Manhattan comes from the word Manatus which may have meant, “island of the hills,” a reference to the
topography (3).
By 1647, Peter Stuyvesant arrived as the
Colony’s director and established the first city
council (Rock and Moore 6). Stuyvesant had been previously Curacao’s director from 1634 to 1644.
New Amsterdam was a small colony (in 1652, the population was about 750), but eighteen different
languages were spoken there (Schappes 1). The Dutch created numerous important zoning and
construction rules as well as imposed provisions for orphans and the poor (Rock and Moore 7). These
acts reflect the benefits of their settlement in New Amsterdam, which could also be noticed in Recife,
located in the northeast of Brazil (Wainer, Legislação 29). The Dutch conquered and occupied Recife
during a period of twenty-four years, specifically from 1630-1654 (Wainer, Legislação 30).
council (Rock and Moore 6). Stuyvesant had been previously Curacao’s director from 1634 to 1644.
New Amsterdam was a small colony (in 1652, the population was about 750), but eighteen different
languages were spoken there (Schappes 1). The Dutch created numerous important zoning and
construction rules as well as imposed provisions for orphans and the poor (Rock and Moore 7). These
acts reflect the benefits of their settlement in New Amsterdam, which could also be noticed in Recife,
located in the northeast of Brazil (Wainer, Legislação 29). The Dutch conquered and occupied Recife
during a period of twenty-four years, specifically from 1630-1654 (Wainer, Legislação 30).
In 1664, New Amsterdam came under English occupation and became
the Duke of York’s,
who was the brother of King Charles II of England (Rock and Moore 14). New Amsterdam’s name was
then changed to New York (Friesel 26). Today, the Big Apple, the popular nickname to New York,
signifies a diverse world of popular entertainment (Rock and Moore 414). New York represents the
world and the Jewish community has a meaningful place in it, and this contribution started at least three
hundred and fifty years ago.
who was the brother of King Charles II of England (Rock and Moore 14). New Amsterdam’s name was
then changed to New York (Friesel 26). Today, the Big Apple, the popular nickname to New York,
signifies a diverse world of popular entertainment (Rock and Moore 414). New York represents the
world and the Jewish community has a meaningful place in it, and this contribution started at least three
hundred and fifty years ago.
III - The Dutch
Brazilian Origins of the First 23 Jewish Settlers of New York: Where did they come from?
2
It seems that Jewish history keeps repeating
itself: threat and persecution over the centuries
obligated the Jews to move and settle in safer places. The first Dutch Jewish settlers of New York came
from Brazil, but in fact their peregrination started in Holland. Before Holland, they came from Portugal,
Spain, and France, among other countries. For example, between the end of the XVI century and
beginning of the XVII century, the first Jewish author in America, Isaac Aboab and his family, moved
from Spain to Portugal, then to France, Holland, Brazil, and then back to Amsterdam (Kayserling,
“Aboab” 125). Aboab did not go to New Amsterdam with the first twenty-three Jewish settlers.
Nevertheless, his story is interesting to mention because his family escaped the persecutions of the
Inquisition in Spain and later on in Portugal, and became refugees in France. In 1612, when Spain and
France were going to close a treaty of mutual extradition of refugee heretics, Aboab’s family went to
live in Amsterdam (Kayserling, “Aboab” 126). Aboab became Rabbi in Amsterdam in 1619
obligated the Jews to move and settle in safer places. The first Dutch Jewish settlers of New York came
from Brazil, but in fact their peregrination started in Holland. Before Holland, they came from Portugal,
Spain, and France, among other countries. For example, between the end of the XVI century and
beginning of the XVII century, the first Jewish author in America, Isaac Aboab and his family, moved
from Spain to Portugal, then to France, Holland, Brazil, and then back to Amsterdam (Kayserling,
“Aboab” 125). Aboab did not go to New Amsterdam with the first twenty-three Jewish settlers.
Nevertheless, his story is interesting to mention because his family escaped the persecutions of the
Inquisition in Spain and later on in Portugal, and became refugees in France. In 1612, when Spain and
France were going to close a treaty of mutual extradition of refugee heretics, Aboab’s family went to
live in Amsterdam (Kayserling, “Aboab” 126). Aboab became Rabbi in Amsterdam in 1619
(Kayserling,
“Aboab” 126). Moreover, in 1642, Aboab received an invitation to become the
Rabbi of Recife, which was under Dutch
occupation and had great tolerance for Jews (Enciclopédia 23). There is a
legend that the Jews of Amsterdam were rich but that is not accurate
(Kayserling, ”Earliest” 13). The Dutch
Jews were traveling to Brazil because they had to fulfill their needs in a new
country in order to support their
families (Kayserling, “Earliest” 13). In fact, as Kohut remarks, “the first
Jewish colony in America was established in Brazil, in 1624, when the
Dutch took possession of that country, bringing some Jewish traders with them” (“Literature” 136).
In Brazil, because of the complaints of the Classis (governing body of the Dutch Reformed
Church in Brazil), Judaism was tolerated but the Jews were ordered to conduct their services in
seclusion (Wiznitzer, “Earliest” 54). In 1642, a group of 200 Jews came to Recife under the leadership
of Rabbi Aboab (Bloom, Economic 130). Holland and its colonies attracted immigrants (Shulvass 22).
The Dutch tolerance towards the Jews was based on the large amount of capital invested in Holland in
shares of the West India Company, W.I.C. (Schappes 4). Trade was a decisive factor in allowing the
Jews to live in Holland and its colonies (Kohler 42). As Kohler states: “it required the leveling and
humanizing influences of commerce to bring about religious toleration” (42). The Dutch West India
Company’s purpose was to monopolize trade in their respective domains, to establish and administer
colonies, to maintain armies and navies, and to conduct war (Faber 10). Although it is difficult to
Church in Brazil), Judaism was tolerated but the Jews were ordered to conduct their services in
seclusion (Wiznitzer, “Earliest” 54). In 1642, a group of 200 Jews came to Recife under the leadership
of Rabbi Aboab (Bloom, Economic 130). Holland and its colonies attracted immigrants (Shulvass 22).
The Dutch tolerance towards the Jews was based on the large amount of capital invested in Holland in
shares of the West India Company, W.I.C. (Schappes 4). Trade was a decisive factor in allowing the
Jews to live in Holland and its colonies (Kohler 42). As Kohler states: “it required the leveling and
humanizing influences of commerce to bring about religious toleration” (42). The Dutch West India
Company’s purpose was to monopolize trade in their respective domains, to establish and administer
colonies, to maintain armies and navies, and to conduct war (Faber 10). Although it is difficult to
3
determine the extent of Jewish participation in the W. I. C., there are
available lists of shareholders
showing that the Jews were members of the company (Bloom, “Study” 49). For that reason, religious
liberty was guaranteed under article XV of the ruling of the West India Company (Emmanuel, “Light”
showing that the Jews were members of the company (Bloom, “Study” 49). For that reason, religious
liberty was guaranteed under article XV of the ruling of the West India Company (Emmanuel, “Light”
4).
In 1654, the Portuguese recovered the city. At that time, Holland
was engaged in a war with
Britain, and the Portuguese used this situation to recapture Recife (Sandler 41). The Portuguese
Britain, and the Portuguese used this situation to recapture Recife (Sandler 41). The Portuguese
executed thirteen Jews, even burning one alive, despite the agreement to
consider the Jews equal to the Dutch (Emmanuel, “Light” 11). Rabbi Aboab was rescued by the Dutch and
went back to live in Amsterdam where he persuaded the wealthy members of the
community to build the great synagogue of Amsterdam (Enciclopédia 23). As a poet, Rabbi Aboab wrote about the misery
and suffering the Jews went through during the war between the Portuguese and
the Hollanders (Kayserling, “Aboab” 127).
It was
a great lost to Brazil when the Rabbi and his community left, but his teachings
were taken and noticed in Holland and in his community in New Amsterdam.
The relevance of this connection is apparent
because Brazil became the “mother” of North
American Jewry (Emmanuel, “Seventeenth” 32). As the Jews had to leave Brazil, they moved and
founded the Jewish community of New Amsterdam. Some of the Jewish passengers that came to New
Amsterdam were registered in the Minutes of the Court of BurgoMasters and Schepens, which represent
the Dutch Records of New Amsterdam. These same names can also be found in the Minute Book of
Congregations Zur Israel of Recife and Magen Abraham of Mauricia. Many scholars, such as
Oppenheim, Wiznitzer, Wolff, have thoroughly researched both Records of New Amsterdam and the
Minute Book of the Brazilian congregations. Unfortunately, there are some discrepancies and
uncertainties about their identities. In spite of that, it is known that Abram Israel, David Israel, Asser
Levy, Moses Ambrosius, Judicq de Mereda, and Ricke Nounes were among the passengers. As just
these names are mentioned in the Records, Wiznitzer explains that the records mention only the names
of all the family heads among the twenty-three Jews (“Exodus” 92). There were six families headed by
four men and two widows. Consequently, there were four men, six women and thirteen children
American Jewry (Emmanuel, “Seventeenth” 32). As the Jews had to leave Brazil, they moved and
founded the Jewish community of New Amsterdam. Some of the Jewish passengers that came to New
Amsterdam were registered in the Minutes of the Court of BurgoMasters and Schepens, which represent
the Dutch Records of New Amsterdam. These same names can also be found in the Minute Book of
Congregations Zur Israel of Recife and Magen Abraham of Mauricia. Many scholars, such as
Oppenheim, Wiznitzer, Wolff, have thoroughly researched both Records of New Amsterdam and the
Minute Book of the Brazilian congregations. Unfortunately, there are some discrepancies and
uncertainties about their identities. In spite of that, it is known that Abram Israel, David Israel, Asser
Levy, Moses Ambrosius, Judicq de Mereda, and Ricke Nounes were among the passengers. As just
these names are mentioned in the Records, Wiznitzer explains that the records mention only the names
of all the family heads among the twenty-three Jews (“Exodus” 92). There were six families headed by
four men and two widows. Consequently, there were four men, six women and thirteen children
4
(Wiznitzer, “Exodus” 92). The “twenty three souls, big and little,” were “poor
and healthy,” as the Reverend Johan Megapolensis described the group (Sandler
39).
The majority of the Jewish immigrants were
Sephardim, but not all (Hershkowitz, “Merchant” 12).
The Ashkenazic Jews were from Germany and Italy (Wiznitzer, “Exodus”
93). Asser Levy, for instance, was
Ashkenazi. Interestingly, he is one of the most known from the group of the
first Jewish settlers who arrived in New Amsterdam. New York City has an Asser Levy Place and an
Asser Levy Public School (Hershkowitz, “Inventories” 24). From the group of the
twenty-three Jewish settlers, Levy was the “natural leader” (De Sola Pool, Faith 24).
Furthermore, Hershkowitz mentions that there was little intermarriage and little
business association between Sephardim and Ashkenazim in the early days of the colony (“Merchant”
12). These may have caused the failure
of the founding colonial Jewish community to extend itself (Hershkowitz, “Merchant”
12).
IV - The First Group
of Jewish Immigrants to New Amsterdam
Kohler, Daly, Wolff, Oppenheim and Wiznitzer differ on details on
the Brazilian exodus and
consequent arrival in New Amsterdam. But, basically they all accept the important facts of the
approximate date and group’s origins. The first twenty-three Jews arrived in New Amsterdam about
September 7, 1654 (Oppenheim, “Barsimson” 39). The author mentions that they were “involuntary
passengers on the ship St. Charles, diverted by pirates from their intended voyage from Brazil to
Holland after the occupation of Recife by the Portuguese” (Oppenheim, “Barsimson” 39).
consequent arrival in New Amsterdam. But, basically they all accept the important facts of the
approximate date and group’s origins. The first twenty-three Jews arrived in New Amsterdam about
September 7, 1654 (Oppenheim, “Barsimson” 39). The author mentions that they were “involuntary
passengers on the ship St. Charles, diverted by pirates from their intended voyage from Brazil to
Holland after the occupation of Recife by the Portuguese” (Oppenheim, “Barsimson” 39).
The first group of Jewish immigrants to New
Amsterdam were so poor that they were unable to
pay the master of the Bark St. Charles, Captain Jacques de la Motthe, for board and passage (Records I
240). In response, the Captain did not allow any of their goods to be carried from the ship. In
September 7, 1654, the Jews were kept and their goods were sold at public auction (Daly 7). Since the
amount was insufficient, two of the Jews from the group, David Israel and Moses Ambrosius, were held
as collateral for the payment of the balance in accordance with the contract (Records I 244). The
Captain transferred the debt to the Crew and the two Jews were released because the crew agreed to
pay the master of the Bark St. Charles, Captain Jacques de la Motthe, for board and passage (Records I
240). In response, the Captain did not allow any of their goods to be carried from the ship. In
September 7, 1654, the Jews were kept and their goods were sold at public auction (Daly 7). Since the
amount was insufficient, two of the Jews from the group, David Israel and Moses Ambrosius, were held
as collateral for the payment of the balance in accordance with the contract (Records I 244). The
Captain transferred the debt to the Crew and the two Jews were released because the crew agreed to
5
wait until the “arrival of the ships from Patria” with funds from
Holland (Records I 259). On the other
hand, Asser Levy who was to become a very litigious figure in the Colony is mentioned first in the
Court Minutes of New Amsterdam of September 14, 1654, not even a week after his arrival (Records I
242). He sued Ricke Nounes demanding repayment of 8 ½ pieces of Eight disbursed on his account at
Gamonike [Jamaica] and fl. 15 for a waistcoat and other things delivered to the defendant (Records I
242). The defendant acknowledged to have borrowed 5 pieces of Eight at Gamonike, and 7 fl. advanced
to her husband (Records I 242). But, she countered with a claim the plaintiff demanding, on the other
side, payment of 12 pieces of Eight disbursed for freight for the plaintiff, with other items making
together fl. 41.11, so that by account a balance remained due to her of fl. 22.5 (Records I 242). Perhaps,
here is the first case of a Jewish woman exercising her rights for justice in America. As Hasia Diner and
Beryl Benderly state, American Jewish history begins in lower Manhattan with Ricke Nounes and
Judicq de Mereda (Praise 7).
hand, Asser Levy who was to become a very litigious figure in the Colony is mentioned first in the
Court Minutes of New Amsterdam of September 14, 1654, not even a week after his arrival (Records I
242). He sued Ricke Nounes demanding repayment of 8 ½ pieces of Eight disbursed on his account at
Gamonike [Jamaica] and fl. 15 for a waistcoat and other things delivered to the defendant (Records I
242). The defendant acknowledged to have borrowed 5 pieces of Eight at Gamonike, and 7 fl. advanced
to her husband (Records I 242). But, she countered with a claim the plaintiff demanding, on the other
side, payment of 12 pieces of Eight disbursed for freight for the plaintiff, with other items making
together fl. 41.11, so that by account a balance remained due to her of fl. 22.5 (Records I 242). Perhaps,
here is the first case of a Jewish woman exercising her rights for justice in America. As Hasia Diner and
Beryl Benderly state, American Jewish history begins in lower Manhattan with Ricke Nounes and
Judicq de Mereda (Praise 7).
It is known that the conditions of the group
were so deplorable that they had to be supported by
the Church (Sandler 40). Reverend Megapolensis, in a letter to the Classis of Amsterdam, in March
1655, reports:
the Church (Sandler 40). Reverend Megapolensis, in a letter to the Classis of Amsterdam, in March
1655, reports:
Some Jews
came from Holland last summer, in order to trade. Later a few Jews came upon
the same ship as DePolheymius; they were healthy but poor…so, we had to spend
several hundred guilders for their support.
(Hastings 335)
Just upon their arrival, the twenty-three
Jewish immigrants experienced the difference of treatment
the Dutch gave to them in New Amsterdam, as they were used to receiving in Amsterdam and in
Recife. The Jews of early New York fought for respect against prejudice and bigotry (Huhner,
“Burgher” 9). Peter Stuyvesant, the Governor-general of the colony, supported by the clergy, moved
every possible step in order to get rid of the Jewish newcomers. He officially requested them, in a
“friendly way,” to depart. On September 22, 1654, just a few days after the Jewish group’s arrival,
Stuyvesant wrote to the Amsterdam Chamber of the Dutch West India Company, demanding that the
Jews “be not allowed to trouble” New Amsterdam (Sandler 41). He mentioned that the group were
the Dutch gave to them in New Amsterdam, as they were used to receiving in Amsterdam and in
Recife. The Jews of early New York fought for respect against prejudice and bigotry (Huhner,
“Burgher” 9). Peter Stuyvesant, the Governor-general of the colony, supported by the clergy, moved
every possible step in order to get rid of the Jewish newcomers. He officially requested them, in a
“friendly way,” to depart. On September 22, 1654, just a few days after the Jewish group’s arrival,
Stuyvesant wrote to the Amsterdam Chamber of the Dutch West India Company, demanding that the
Jews “be not allowed to trouble” New Amsterdam (Sandler 41). He mentioned that the group were
6
“hateful enemies of the Christians” (Schappes 1-2). Peter Stuyvesant’s
words sounded as anti-Semitic then as they sound now. Fortunately, the governor’s
words fell on deaf ears.
Thus, there was “another enemy of the Jews”
at that time (Huhner, “Burgher” 10). Cornelis van
Tienhoven, the “Shout”, or Sheriff of New Amsterdam, who escalated from being a clerk to a position
of authority in the colony (Huhner, “Burgher” 10). On January 1655, the Amsterdam Jews petitioned to
the Lords, Directors of the Chartered West India Company (Schappes 2). They asked to extend the
same rights they had to the Jews of New Amsterdam (Schappes 2). The land was extensive and
spacious (Oppenheim, “Barsimson” 40). The more loyal people, like the Jews, the better it would be to
increase the population and trade in the colony (Oppenheim, “Barsimson” 40). At that time, there were
obstacles to the giving of permits or passports to the Portuguese Jews to travel and reside in New
Amsterdam (Schappes 2). For that purpose, they assigned four reasons why the group should be
allowed to stay in New Amsterdam, despite Stuyvesant’s objections (Schappes 2). Their reasoning are
briefly stated below (Schappes 2):
Tienhoven, the “Shout”, or Sheriff of New Amsterdam, who escalated from being a clerk to a position
of authority in the colony (Huhner, “Burgher” 10). On January 1655, the Amsterdam Jews petitioned to
the Lords, Directors of the Chartered West India Company (Schappes 2). They asked to extend the
same rights they had to the Jews of New Amsterdam (Schappes 2). The land was extensive and
spacious (Oppenheim, “Barsimson” 40). The more loyal people, like the Jews, the better it would be to
increase the population and trade in the colony (Oppenheim, “Barsimson” 40). At that time, there were
obstacles to the giving of permits or passports to the Portuguese Jews to travel and reside in New
Amsterdam (Schappes 2). For that purpose, they assigned four reasons why the group should be
allowed to stay in New Amsterdam, despite Stuyvesant’s objections (Schappes 2). Their reasoning are
briefly stated below (Schappes 2):
1 - The Jews could
not go to Spain or Portugal because of the Inquisition.
2 - The Jews have
risked “their possessions and blood” to defend Dutch interests in Brazil.
3 - The French and
English allowed Jews in their colonies.
4 - There were Jews who were “principal shareholders” (persons who had
invested at least 6,000 guilders each) in the Dutch West India Company.
Therefore, Stuyvesant was overruled and the
Jewish pioneers were allowed to stay in New
Amsterdam. The Governor might have felt threatened by the arrival of only 23 Jews because the
population consisted of approximately 750 people speaking 18 different languages (Schappes 1). They
were described by many accounts, as sailors and thieves. Therefore, the arrival of 23 well educated
immigrants, but of an alien religion, could have been a threat to the religious establishment of the colony.
Stuyvesant held the belief of a unified church and state, so the Jews became a potential threat.
Amsterdam. The Governor might have felt threatened by the arrival of only 23 Jews because the
population consisted of approximately 750 people speaking 18 different languages (Schappes 1). They
were described by many accounts, as sailors and thieves. Therefore, the arrival of 23 well educated
immigrants, but of an alien religion, could have been a threat to the religious establishment of the colony.
Stuyvesant held the belief of a unified church and state, so the Jews became a potential threat.
7
Following this development, in March 1st, 1655, Abraham De La
Simon was brought before the
Court of Burgomaster (Daly 11). The Sheriff communicated to him that he could not keep his store
open on Sunday (Daly 11). The Court applied a stiff fine to the Jewish shopkeeper for daring to
disrespect the Christian Sunday. Back then, the struggle for the separation of church and state had
begun. The Sheriff Tienhoven was substituting for Stuyvesant who had gone to West Indies to protest
against interference with trade and against the seizure of Dutch vessels by English privateers (Huhner,
“Burgher” 12).
Court of Burgomaster (Daly 11). The Sheriff communicated to him that he could not keep his store
open on Sunday (Daly 11). The Court applied a stiff fine to the Jewish shopkeeper for daring to
disrespect the Christian Sunday. Back then, the struggle for the separation of church and state had
begun. The Sheriff Tienhoven was substituting for Stuyvesant who had gone to West Indies to protest
against interference with trade and against the seizure of Dutch vessels by English privateers (Huhner,
“Burgher” 12).
The Sheriff also said that the Governor and
Council resolved that the Jews who had come in the
preceding autumn, as well as the other Jewish fellows who had arrived from Holland should depart
(Daly 11). Daly believes that because of this order, many Jewish immigrants left for Rhode Island and
settled in Newport, where they were later joined by others who came directly from Curacao (14-15).
preceding autumn, as well as the other Jewish fellows who had arrived from Holland should depart
(Daly 11). Daly believes that because of this order, many Jewish immigrants left for Rhode Island and
settled in Newport, where they were later joined by others who came directly from Curacao (14-15).
Hence, Jews in Holland continued to lobby
and intercede with the Directors of the Dutch West
India Company in favor of their brothers and sisters living in the New World. The Directors of the
Company knew that the presence of the Jews was beneficial to New Amsterdam. They felt that the
loyalty of these Dutch Jews, who were of Portuguese and Spanish decent, together with the Jewish
capital investments in Holland outweighed Stuyvesant’s prejudice and intolerance (Schappes 4).
India Company in favor of their brothers and sisters living in the New World. The Directors of the
Company knew that the presence of the Jews was beneficial to New Amsterdam. They felt that the
loyalty of these Dutch Jews, who were of Portuguese and Spanish decent, together with the Jewish
capital investments in Holland outweighed Stuyvesant’s prejudice and intolerance (Schappes 4).
On April 26, 1655, the Amsterdam Chamber of
the West India Company replied to Stuyvesant’s letter. In conclusion, it was decided
that the Portuguese Jews could travel and trade to and in New Amsterdam and live
there (Schappes 4). The date W.I.C. gave the right to the Jews to live and
remain in New
Amsterdam marks the official settlement of Jews in North America. It also marks the beginning of the Spanish
Portuguese Congregation now called Shearith Israel (Wischnitzer 11). As a result, it is interesting to observe
that the Spanish Portuguese Synagogue is directly related to the Portuguese expulsion of the Jews
and the Dutch from Brazil.
The fight for Jewish equal rights, however,
continued as long as Peter Stuyvesant was Governor.
Even though Jews had been assured the right to remain in New Amsterdam, Stuyvesant continued to
cause trouble and difficulty for the Jewish people. Later in that same year, precisely, on August 28,
Peter Stuyvesant and the New Amsterdam Council decided to exclude Jews from the military service
Even though Jews had been assured the right to remain in New Amsterdam, Stuyvesant continued to
cause trouble and difficulty for the Jewish people. Later in that same year, precisely, on August 28,
Peter Stuyvesant and the New Amsterdam Council decided to exclude Jews from the military service
8
(Schappes 5). By this
resolution, Stuyvesant denied a civic right and imposed a special tax applied
only to the Jews (Schappes
5). The interesting part is that Stuyvesant justified his tax resolution by
stating that each male person over 16 and
less than 60 years “contribute for the aforesaid freedom towards the relief of the general municipal taxes 65 stivers
[$1.20] every month” (Schappes 6).
Asser Levy and Jacob Barsimson really struggled with Peter
Stuyvesant for the burgher right
(Hershkowitz, “Jewish Merchant” 12). In November 5, the New Amsterdam Council had to pronounce
themselves on the petition of Barsimson and Levy to be granted permission to keep guard with other
burghers, or be free from the tax which others of their nation pay (Schappes 6). The petition was denied,
but the right to stand guard was won later (Schappes 6). In this case, Levy and Barsimson were
demanding equal treatment, rights, and obligations for them and their fellow Jews. Equal rights in the
colony were progressively achieved but every stage involved a specific struggle for the early Jews.
(Hershkowitz, “Jewish Merchant” 12). In November 5, the New Amsterdam Council had to pronounce
themselves on the petition of Barsimson and Levy to be granted permission to keep guard with other
burghers, or be free from the tax which others of their nation pay (Schappes 6). The petition was denied,
but the right to stand guard was won later (Schappes 6). In this case, Levy and Barsimson were
demanding equal treatment, rights, and obligations for them and their fellow Jews. Equal rights in the
colony were progressively achieved but every stage involved a specific struggle for the early Jews.
By November 29, 1655, Abraham deLucena,
Salvador Dandrada, and Jacob Cohen petitioned to
the Director General and Council of New Amsterdam for themselves and in the name of others of the
Jewish nation (Schappes 7). They requested the right to travel and trade on the South River of New
Netherland, at Fort Orange and other places situated within the jurisdiction of the Government of New
Amsterdam (Schappes 7). The Jewish struggle for equal rights in New Amsterdam continued, as they
still didn’t have the right to own property. In December 1655, Salvador Dandrada had to petition to the
Council of New Amsterdam for the right to own a house (Schappes 8). Eventually, the case was
resolved since the owner of the house returned to Holland and, therefore, helped exert pressure on the
Council.
the Director General and Council of New Amsterdam for themselves and in the name of others of the
Jewish nation (Schappes 7). They requested the right to travel and trade on the South River of New
Netherland, at Fort Orange and other places situated within the jurisdiction of the Government of New
Amsterdam (Schappes 7). The Jewish struggle for equal rights in New Amsterdam continued, as they
still didn’t have the right to own property. In December 1655, Salvador Dandrada had to petition to the
Council of New Amsterdam for the right to own a house (Schappes 8). Eventually, the case was
resolved since the owner of the house returned to Holland and, therefore, helped exert pressure on the
Council.
More was about to come… In February 22nd,
1656, the Jews finally obtained the right to
purchase a Jewish cemetery. This was achieved after the authorities had denied it before (June 1655).
Furthermore, in June 14, 1656, Joseph D’Acosta, a principal shareholder in the Company among the
Directors of the Dutch West India Company, sent a letter to Stuyvesant. He requested prompt obedience
and mentioned that the Jews might exercise in all quietness their religion within their houses (Schappes
12). For that purpose, they must build their houses close together in a convenient place on one or the
other side of New Amsterdam - at their choice - as done in Amsterdam (Schappes 12).
purchase a Jewish cemetery. This was achieved after the authorities had denied it before (June 1655).
Furthermore, in June 14, 1656, Joseph D’Acosta, a principal shareholder in the Company among the
Directors of the Dutch West India Company, sent a letter to Stuyvesant. He requested prompt obedience
and mentioned that the Jews might exercise in all quietness their religion within their houses (Schappes
12). For that purpose, they must build their houses close together in a convenient place on one or the
other side of New Amsterdam - at their choice - as done in Amsterdam (Schappes 12).
9
In the beginning of 1657, an ordinance was
passed in New Amsterdam, which stated that for
trade privileges the “burgher right” was vital (Schappes 12-13). Asser Levy appeared in Court and
petitioned to be admitted as a burgher (Huhner, “Burgher” 15). He asked for the same rights and
showed a burgher certificate from the city of Amsterdam, proving that he was a burgher there (Records
VII 154). As obstacles were still imposed upon the Jewish people, the Directors in April 20, 1657,
requested from Stuyvesant extension of the same rights they had in Holland to the Jews in New
Amsterdam (Schappes 12-13). Therefore, they urged that the Jews should not be excluded nor shut out
from the Burgher right (Schappes 13).
trade privileges the “burgher right” was vital (Schappes 12-13). Asser Levy appeared in Court and
petitioned to be admitted as a burgher (Huhner, “Burgher” 15). He asked for the same rights and
showed a burgher certificate from the city of Amsterdam, proving that he was a burgher there (Records
VII 154). As obstacles were still imposed upon the Jewish people, the Directors in April 20, 1657,
requested from Stuyvesant extension of the same rights they had in Holland to the Jews in New
Amsterdam (Schappes 12-13). Therefore, they urged that the Jews should not be excluded nor shut out
from the Burgher right (Schappes 13).
The Jews of New Amsterdam continued to
encounter other obstacles in their path for survival in
the Colony. An interesting event happened in June 1658, which was just four years after the arrival of
the Jewish pilgrims. Two lawsuits were brought against Jacob Barsimson. The court proceedings took
place on Sabbath (Records II 367). Barsimson did not show up in court. Curiously, he was not cited for
contempt of court (Records II 367). This might have suggested that some degree of tolerance towards
the Jewish observance of the Sabbath occurred for the first time in the judicial system of New
Amsterdam.
the Colony. An interesting event happened in June 1658, which was just four years after the arrival of
the Jewish pilgrims. Two lawsuits were brought against Jacob Barsimson. The court proceedings took
place on Sabbath (Records II 367). Barsimson did not show up in court. Curiously, he was not cited for
contempt of court (Records II 367). This might have suggested that some degree of tolerance towards
the Jewish observance of the Sabbath occurred for the first time in the judicial system of New
Amsterdam.
In October 1660, Levy was fundamental in
attaining equal protection of the Law for his fellow Jews. Levy was in the forefront of
securing civil rights (Stern, “Namesakes” 234). Asser Levy and Moses Lucena got the licenses
from the authorities to become butchers, and as Jews were exempted from slaughtering hogs (Schappes 16). When the
British took over New Amsterdam in 1664, Levy signed the oath of allegiance to the British crown (Stern, “Namesakes”
234). In 1665, Asser Levy was sworn
again under the English as a slaughterer of animals (Oppenheim, “Meat” 42).
Since Levy appears as a litigant so
many times in the Court Minutes, it seems that he was one of the first citizens
to appeal for justice and defend his
own case in the beginning of the colonial Jewish life.
In conclusion, one realizes that the Jews
contributed immensely to the advancement of equal
rights in the colony of New Amsterdam. Schappes concluded that American life and history would not
have been the same without these pilgrim Jews and the ones that came every century thereafter (XX). In
Schappes words:
rights in the colony of New Amsterdam. Schappes concluded that American life and history would not
have been the same without these pilgrim Jews and the ones that came every century thereafter (XX). In
Schappes words:
10
The names and activities of hundreds of Jews, when taken alone might
never appear in the
pages of an American historical volume, but American life and history would have never
been the same if these Jews have never come, worked, prayed, written, or petitioned or sued
pages of an American historical volume, but American life and history would have never
been the same if these Jews have never come, worked, prayed, written, or petitioned or sued
or complained, or
fought, or died, or simply were Americans, Jewish Americans. (XX-XXI)
American history is now richer, by the Jewish
contribution to American democratic ideals
(Schappes XXI). As Miranda in “The Tempest” of Shakespeare said when she saw men for the first
time: “O brave New World that has such people in it!” Shakespeare’s words can be transposed to the
(Schappes XXI). As Miranda in “The Tempest” of Shakespeare said when she saw men for the first
time: “O brave New World that has such people in it!” Shakespeare’s words can be transposed to the
admiration for the tenacity of these first Jewish settlers of New York,
and all the generations of
immigrants that followed. In an outstanding effort to maintain their identity, but also to become
Americans, Jews helped obtain equal rights and liberty for Americans of all races and religions.
immigrants that followed. In an outstanding effort to maintain their identity, but also to become
Americans, Jews helped obtain equal rights and liberty for Americans of all races and religions.
In the world of today, especially after nine
eleven, when anti-Semitism strikes at the core of
western societies, it is important to realize that the danger to one human being or religion endangers the
entire world. That is exactly what the first Jewish settlers of New Amsterdam fought for. While
assimilating a new culture, they remained connected to their traditions. They peacefully took a position
against a discriminating Governor, Sheriff, and the Reverend of the Dutch Reformed Church, and against
all imaginable odds, founded one of the most important Jewish communities in the world. New York City
is now a place of enormous cultural and financial influence for the entire world, and remains a city
embracing people of all races, religions, and beliefs. That is what makes this story and the journey of the
first Jewish pilgrims so fascinating!
western societies, it is important to realize that the danger to one human being or religion endangers the
entire world. That is exactly what the first Jewish settlers of New Amsterdam fought for. While
assimilating a new culture, they remained connected to their traditions. They peacefully took a position
against a discriminating Governor, Sheriff, and the Reverend of the Dutch Reformed Church, and against
all imaginable odds, founded one of the most important Jewish communities in the world. New York City
is now a place of enormous cultural and financial influence for the entire world, and remains a city
embracing people of all races, religions, and beliefs. That is what makes this story and the journey of the
first Jewish pilgrims so fascinating!
11
Bibliography
Altabe, David Fintz.
“The Sephardim in America.” Spanish and Portuguese Jewry before and after 1492:
New York:
Sepher-Hermon Press, 1993.
Angel, Marc D. From
Strength to Strength: Lectures from Shearith Israel. New York: Sepher-Hermon,
1998.
---. La America:The
Sephardic Experience in the United States. Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication
Society of
America, 1982.
---. Voices in
Exile: A Study in Sephardic Intellectual History. New York: Ktav Publishing House, 1991.
Blau, Joseph L., and
Salo W. Baron. The Jews of the United
States 1790-1840. Philadelphia: The
Jewish
Publication Society
of America, 1963.
Bloom, Herbert
I. The Economic Activities of the Jews
of Amsterdam in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth
Centuries. New York: Kennikat Press, 1937.
---. “A Study of
Brazilian Jewish History 1623-1654, based chiefly upon the findings of the late
Samuel
Oppenheim.” American Jewish Historical Society 33 (1934): 43-125.
12
Bohm, Gunter. Los
Sefardies en los dominios holandeses de America del Sur y del Caribe. Frankfurt:
Vervuert, 1992.
Boxer, C.R. The Dutch in Brazil. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 1957.
Calado, Fr.
Manoel. O Valeroso Lucideno e Triunfo da
Liberdade. Recife: Editora Cultural Intelectual de
Pernambuco, 1942.
Callaghan, E.B.
Documents relative to the Colonial History of the State of New York. Albany:
Weed, Parsons
and Company,
Printers, 1858.
---. Calendar of
Historical Manuscripts in the Office of the Secretary of State. Albany: Weed,
Parsons
and Company, 1865.
---. History of New
Netherland; or, New York under the Dutch.
New York: D. Appleton & Company, 1845.
Corre, Alan D. “The
Sephardim of the United States of America.” The Sephardi Heritage II.
Northants:
Gibraltar Books,
1989.
Correia de Andrade,
Manuel. A Itália no Nordeste. Recife: Editora Massangana, 1992.
Daly, Charles P. The
Settlement of the Jews in North America. New York: Philip Cowen, 1893.
Danzger, M.
Herbert. Returning to Tradition: The
Contemporary Revival of Orthodox Judaism.
New Haven:
Yale University
Press, 1989.
Diaz-Mas,
Paloma. Sephardim: The Jews from
Spain. Chicago: The University of
Chicago Press, 1992.
Diner, Hasia R., and Beryl Lieff Benderly. Her Works Praise Her: A
History of Jewish Women in America
from
from
13
Colonial Times to the
Present. New York: Basic Books, 2002.
---. Jews in America. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Dyer, Alexander
Morris. “Points in the Chapter of New York Jewish History.” American Jewish
Historical
Society 3 (1895): 41-60.
Emmanuel, I.S. “New
Light on Early American Jewry.” American Jewish
Archives
VII, 4 (1955): 3-64.
---. “Seventeenth-Century
Brazilian Jewry.” American
Jewish Archives (1962): 32-68.
Enciclopédia
Judaica. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Tradição, 1967: 23, 923-924.
Faber, Eli. A Time for Planting:
the First Migration, 1654-1820.
Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University,
1943.
1943.
Fernow, Berthold. The Records of
New Amsterdam: Minutes of the Court of BurgoMasters and Schepens
1653-
1653-
1655 (I). New York: The Knickerbocker Press, 1897.
---. Documents relating to the History and
Settlements of the Towns along the Hudson and Mohawk Rivers.
Albany: Weed, Parsons
and Company, 1881.
Friedman, Lee M.
Early American Jews. Cambridge: Harvard University Press: 1934.
---. “Portraits
Etched in Stone. Early Jewish Settlers, 1682-1831.” American Jewish
Archives
1 (1954): 33-37.
---. “American
History: The History of Immigrants.” The
Writing of American Jewish History.
American Jewish
Historical Society (1957): 194-195.
Friesel,
Evyatar. Atlas of Modern Jewish
History. New York: Oxford University
Press, 1990.
Gerber, Jane. The
Jews of Spain: A History of the Sephardic Experience. New York: The Free Press, 1992.
14
Goodman, Abram
Vossen. American Overture: Jewish Rights
in Colonial Times. Philadelphia: The
Jewish
Publication Society
of America, 1947.
Grinstein, Hyman
B. The Rise of the Jewish Community of
New York 1654-1860. Philadelphia: The
Jewish
Publication Society
of America, 1945.
---. “Writing the
History of a Large American Jewish Community.” The American Jewish Historical Society,
1957: 170-176.
Grollman, Earl A.
Dictionary of American Jewish Biography in the Seventeenth Century. American Jewish
Archives. III (1950).
Hastings, Hugh.
Ecclesiastical Records. Albany: James B. Lyon, 1901.
Hershkowitz, Leo. “Some
Aspects of the New York Jewish Merchant and Community, 1654-1820.”
American Jewish
Historical Quarterly 66(1976-1977): 10-34.
---. “Asser Levy and
the Inventories of Early New York Jews.” American Jewish History 80 (1990-1991): 21-
55.
Hollander, J.H. “Some
Unpublished Material Relating to Dr. Jacob Lumbrozo, Of Maryland."
American Jewish
Historical Society 1 (1905): 25-39.
Huhner, Leon.“Whence
Came the First Settlers of New York.”American Jewish Historical Society 9(1901):75-
85.
---. “Asser Levy, a
Noted Jewish Burgher, of New Amsterdam.”
American
Jewish Historical Society 8: 9-23.
Hyman, E., and
Deborah Dash Moore. Jewish Women in
America: an Historical Encyclopedia. New
York:
Routledge, 1997.
15
Israel, Jonathan I. “Some Further Data
on the Amsterdam Sephardim and their Trade with Spain during the
1650s.” Studia
Rosenthaliana 14 (1980): 7-19.
Kaufman, Tania Neumann. Passos
Perdidos - História Recuperada: a Presença Judaica em Pernambuco.
Recife:
Recife:
Editora Bagaço, 2000.
Kaplan, Yosef. The Intellectual Ferment in the
Spanish-Portuguese Community of Seventeenth Century
Amsterdam. Jerusalem:
Magnes Press, The Hebrew University, 1992.
Kayserling, M. “Isaac Aboab, The First Jewish Author in
America.” American Jewish Historical Society 5
(1897): 125-136.
---. “The Earliest
Rabbis and Jewish Writers of America.” American Jewish Historical Society III (1895): 13-
20.
---. “The
Colonization of America by the Jews.” American Jewish
Historical Society 2:73-76.
Kohler, Max J. “Phases
of Jewish Life in New York Before 1800.”
New
York Genealogical and Biographical
Record 2 (1894): 77-100.
---. “Beginnings of
New York Jewish History.” American Jewish
Historical Society 1 (1905): 41-48.
---.”Some Jewish
Factors in the Settlement of the West.” American Jewish
Historical Society 16 (1907): 23-35.
---. “Civil Status
of the Jews in Colonial New York.” American Jewish Historical Society 6: 81-106.
Kohut, George
Alexander. “Jewish Martyrs of the
Inquisition in South America.” American Jewish
Historical
Society (1896): 101-187.
---. ”Early Jewish
Literature in America.” American
Jewish Historical Society (1895): 103-147.
16
Kuhn, Arthur K. “Hugo Grotius and the Emancipation of the
Jews in Holland.” American Jewish
Historical
Society 31 (1928): 173-180.
Learsi, Rufus. The Jews in America: A History. Cleveland: The World Publishing, 1954.
Lindo, E.H. The
History of the Jews of Spain and Portugal.
London: Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans.
Lipiner, Elias. Gaspar da Gama:
Um Converso na Frota de Cabral. Rio de
Janeiro: Editora Nova Fronteira,
1986.
1986.
Lyons, Rev. J. J.”Miscellaneous
Items Relating to Jews in New York.” American Jewish Historical Society. 27
(1920): 379-403.
---.“Items Relating
to Congregation Shearith Israel, New York.” American Jewish Historical Society 27 (1920).
---.”Items Relating
to Cemeteries of Congregation Shearith Israel, New York.” American Jewish
Historical
Society 27 (1920):
265-278.
Malamed, Sandra Cumings. The Jews in Early America: A Chronicle of Good
Taste and Good Deeds. California:
Fithian Press, 2003.
Marcus, Jacob
Rader. Early American Jewry (1649-1794)
1. Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication of America,
1961.
---. “The Oldest
Known Synagogue Record Book of Continental North America, 1720-1721.” Studies
in
American Jewish
History. Cincinatti: Hebrew Union
College Press, 1969: 44-53.
---. “Background for
the History of the American Jew.” Studies in American Jewish History: 195-221.
---. The Colonial
American Jew 1492-1776. Detroit: Wayne
State University Press: 1970.
17
---. The American
Jew, 1585-1990: A History. New York:
Carlson Publishing, 1995.
Mello, Jose Antonio Gonsalves de.
Tempo dos flamengos: influência da ocupação holandesa na vida e na
cultura
cultura
do Norte do
Brasil. Recife: FUNDAJ, Editora
Massangana, 1987.
---. Os Judaizantes
nas Capitanias de Cima. São Paulo:
Editora Brasiliense, 1969.
---. Gente da Nacao:
Cristãos-novos e Judeus em Pernambuco, 1542-1654. Recife: FUNDAJ, Editora
Massangana, 1990.
---. Primeira
Visitação do Santo Ofício as Partes do Brasil: Confissões de Pernambuco
1594-1595. Recife:
Universidade Federal
de Pernambuco, 1970.
Mendes dos
Remédios. Os Judeus Portugueses em
Amsterdam. Coimbra: F. França Amado,
1911.
Mendonça, Heitor Furtado de.
Primeira Visitação do Santo Ofício as Partes do Brasil: Confissões da
Bahia
1591-
1591-
92. Rio de Janeiro: Briguiet Editores, 1935.
Moore, Deborah Dash.
At Home in America: Second Generation New York Jews. New York: Columbia
University Press,
1981.
---. Morris, Maxwell
H. “Roger Williams and the Jews.” American Jewish Archives III, 2(1950): 24-27.
Oppenheim,
Samuel. “The Early History of the Jews
in New York, 1654-1664.”
American Jewish
Historical Quarterly 18 (1909): 1-91.
---. “The Question
of the Kosher Meat Supply in New York in 1818: With a Sketch of Early
Conditions.”
American Jewish
Historical Society 25 (1917): 21-62.
18
---. “More about
Jacob Barsimson.” American
Jewish Historical Society (1925): 39-51.
Rink, Oliver A. Holland on the Hudson: An Economic and Social
History of Dutch. New York: Cornell
University Press,
1986.
Pessin,
Deborah. History of the Jews in
America. New York: Commission on Jewish
Education, 1957.
---. Giants on the
Earth. New York: Behrman House, 1949.
Phillips, N. Taylor. “A
Landmark.” American
Jewish Historical Society 1 (1893): 91-92.
---. “Sketch of the
Spanish and Portuguese Congregation Shearith Israel.” American Jewish
Historical Society
XXI (1913): 1913.
---. “The
Congregation Shearith Israel: An Historical Review.” American Jewish Historical Society 21 (1897):
123-140.
---. “Unwritten
History.” American
Jewish Archives 6 (1954): 75-104.
Phillips, Rosalie S. “A Burial Place for
the Jewish Nation Forever.” American Jewish
Historical Society XVIII
(1909): 93-123.
Pool, David De
Sola. Portraits Etched in Stone. New York: Columbia University Press, 1952.
---. The Mill Street Synagogue (1730-1817) of the Congregation Shearith
Israel (Founded in the City of New
York
York
in 1655). New York:
1930.
---. The Crosby
Street Synagogue of the Congregation Shearith Israel. New York:1934.
Pool, David De Sola,
and Tamar De Sola Pool. An Old Faith in the New World: Portrait of Shearith
Israel. New
York: Columbia
University Press, 1955.
19
Pratt, John Webb.
Religion, Politics, and Diversity; the Church-State Theme in New York. New
York: Cornell
University Press,
1967.
“Primeira Sinagoga,
Agora e Atracao Turistica.” Revista Morasha 37 (2002): 40-42.
Rodrigues, Jose Honório. Historiografia e Bibliografia do Domínio
Holandês no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro:
Imprensa
Imprensa
Nacional, 1949.
Rink, Oliver A. Holland on the Hudson: An Economical and
Social History of Dutch New York. New
York:
Cornell University
Press, 1987.
Rock, Howard B, and
Deborah Dash Moore. Cityscapes: a
History of New York in Images. New York:
Columbia University
Press, 2001.
Rosenbloom, Joseph
R. A Biographical Dictionary of Early American Jews: Colonial Times through
1800.
Kentucky: University
of Kentucky: 1960.
Rosendale,
Simon. “An Early Ownership of Real
Estate in Albany, New York by a Jewish trader.”
American Jewish
Historical Society 3 (1894): 61-71.
Rosenwaike,
Ira. On the Edge of Greatness: A
Portrait of American Jewry in the Early National Period.
Cincinnati: American
Jewish Archives: 1936.
---. Population
History of New York City. New York:
Syracuse University Press, 1972.
Ross, James R.
Fragile Branches: Travels Through the Jewish Diaspora. New York:RiverHead
Books, 2000.
Roth, Cecil. A History of the Marranos. New York: Harper TorchBooks, 1932.
---. ”Immanuel Aboab’s
Proselytization of the Marranos.” The Jewish Quarterly Review 23 (1932): 121-
162.
20
Samuel, Wilfred
S. “Sir William Davidson, Royalist,
(1616-1689) and the Jews.”
The Jewish
Historical Society of England XIV (1935-1939): 39-64.
Sandler, Philip. “Earliest Jewish Settlers in New York.” New York History (1955): 39-50.
Sarna, Jonathan. The American Jewish Experience. New York: Holmes and Meier, 1997.
Schappes, Morris U. A Documentary History of the Jews in the United States 1654-1875.
Sarna, Jonathan. The American Jewish Experience. New York: Holmes and Meier, 1997.
Schappes, Morris U. A Documentary History of the Jews in the United States 1654-1875.
New York: The Citadel
Press, 1950.
Silva, Leonardo
Dantas. “A Primeira Comunidade Judaica
do Novo Mundo.” A Fenix ou o Eterno Retorno :
460 Anos da Presença
Judaica em Pernambuco. Brasília:
Ministério da Cultura.
Programa Monumenta,
2001.
---. “A Saga de um
grupo de judeus de Recife.” Revista Morasha 35 (2001): 52-54.
---. “Rabbi Aboab da
Fonseca, um pioneiro das letras hebraicas.” Revista Morasha 34 (2001): 62-65.
Schermerhorn Jr., Richard.
Representative Pioneer Settlers of New Netherland and their Original
Homes
Places.
Places.
Baltimore:
Genealogical Publishing Co., 1979.
Shulvass, Moses A.
From East to West: The WestWard Migration of Jews from Eastern Europe during
the
Seventeenth and
Eighteenth Centuries. Detroit: Wayne
University, 1971.
Southey, Robert.
History of Brazil 1, 2. New York: Burt Franklin Publisher, 1971.
Stern, Malcolm. “Asser
Levy - A New Look at Our Jewish Founding Father.”
American Jewish
Archives
XXVI (1974): 66-77.
---. “Asher Levy,
New Jersey Revolutionary, and his Colonial Namesakes.” New Jersey History: 233-236.
21
---. “Americans of
Jewish Descent.” National Genealogical Society Quarterly (1958): 1-10.
Stokes, I. N.
Phelps. The Iconography of Manhattan Island. New York: Arno Press, 1967.
Strykker-Rodda,
Harriet (Mott). “Asser Levy’s Estate.” The New York
Genealogical
and Biographical
Record
102,3: 129-188.
Video. They Came for
Good: A History of Jews in the United States.
2001 Amram
Nowak Associates.
Directed by Amram Nowak.
Wainer, Ann Helen. “Domínio
Holandês no Nordeste Brasileiro e sua Legislação Ambiental.” Legislação
Ambiental
Brasileira: Subsídios para a História do Direito Ambiental. Rio de Janeiro:
Editora Forense,
1991: 28-34, 116-117.
---. “The “Língua”:The Jewish Interpreter (The History and the Role of
the Jews Connected to India in the XV
and
and
XVI Century).” (Spring term paper for the Indian Judaism course at the
Religious Studies Department
at
Florida International
University).
Weinryb, Bernard
D. “Jewish Immigration and Accommodation
to America: Research, Facts, Problems.”
The Writing of
American Jewish History. American Jewish Historical Society (1957): 366-403.
Wenger, Beth S. The
Jewish Americans. New York:Doubleday, 2007.
Wilson, James Grant.
The Memorial History of the City of New-York.
New York: New York History, 1892.
Wischnitzer, Rachel. Synagogue
Architecture in the United States: History and Interpretation. Philadelphia:
The
The
22
Jewish Publication
Society of America, 1955.
Wiznitzer,
Arnold. Jews in Colonial Brazil. New
York: Columbia University Press, 1960.
---. “The Exodus
from Brazil and Arrival in New Amsterdam of the Jewish Pilgrim Fathers, 1654.” American
Jewish Historical
Society
44 (1954): 80-97.
---. “The Number of
Jews in Dutch Brazil.” Jewish
Social Studies (1954): 106-114.
---. The Records of
Earliest Jewish Community in New World. New York: American
Jewish Historical
Society, 1954.
Wolff, Egon, and
Frieda Wolff. “A Aventura Holandesa.” Fatos Históricos e Mitos da História dos
Judeus no
Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Xenon Editora, 1996: 40-55.
---. “Os Vinte e Três Imigrantes Israelitas de Nova Amsterdã.” Fatos
Históricos e Mitos da História dos Judeus
no
no
Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Xenon Editora, 1996: 56-77.
---. “O cemitério
perdido de Recife.” Nossas Três Vidas e outras histórias. Rio de Janeiro: Imprimatur, 1999,
194-196.
---. “The Problem of the First Jewish Settlers in New Amsterdam, 1654.”
Studia
Rosenthaliana XV (1981):
169-
169-
177.
---. “Mistaken Identities of Signatories of the Congregation Zur Israel,
Recife.” Studia
Rosenthaliana XII
(1978):
(1978):
91-107.
23
---. A Odisséia dos
Judeus de Recife. São Paulo: Centro de
Estudos Judaicos, 1979.
---. Dicionário
Biográfico I: Judaizantes e Judeus no Brasil 1500-1808. Rio de Janeiro: Erca
Ed., 1986.
World Wide Web.
<www.alden.org/heritage/househistory.htm>.
World Wide Web.
<www.americanjewisharchives.org>.
World Wide Web.
<www.amuseum.org/jahf/virtour>.
World Wide Web.
<www.getty.edu/art/collections/bio/a3261-1.html>.
World Wide Web.
<www.nationalmuseet.dk>.
World Wide
Web.<recife.pe.gov.br/cidade/projetos/recifec/holanda/holanda3>. World Wide
Web.<sephardichouse.org/identity/shearithisrael.html>.
World Wide Web.<www.shearith-israel.org/folder/history_main.html>.
World Wide Web.<www.sephardicstudies.org/csi1 1.html>.
World Wide Web. <www.standish-history.org.uk/history>.
World Wide Web. <tourosynagogue.org >.
World Wide Web.<www.shearith-israel.org/folder/history_main.html>.
World Wide Web.<www.sephardicstudies.org/csi1 1.html>.
World Wide Web. <www.standish-history.org.uk/history>.
World Wide Web. <tourosynagogue.org >.
World Wide Web.
<www.350th.org>.
24
No comments:
Post a Comment